DORA — the readiness and evidence pack for financial entities
Scope and price are agreed in writing before work starts.
For financial entities in any EU Member State, supervised by the national competent authority under their licence (in Bulgaria, for example, the BNB or the FSC), and for the ICT providers they depend on. The readiness and evidence pack applied to DORA: assessment of the ICT-risk framework, the register of information and the agreed evidence.
When you need this service
- You are a financial entity and the supervisor will ask for DORA (EU Digital Operational Resilience Act) evidence.
- The register of information or supplier contracts are not in order.
- You know the gaps but need someone to deliver the plan.
The benefit for your organisation
- Management sees where the entity stands against DORA and what to decide first.
- The register of information and the evidence are organised for the supervisor.
- Implementation starts from the real gaps, not a generic list.
For whom
One financial entity in any EU Member State, supervised by the national competent authority under its licence (in Bulgaria, for example, the BNB or the FSC) — and, indirectly, the ICT providers it depends on.
Typical trigger: A supervisory request, a register submission, a new ICT contract, or the management body asking where the entity stands.
What you receive
- Gap assessment and prioritised roadmap
- Review of supplier and ICT contracts against the regulation
- Presentation of findings for management and auditors
One control, several regulations
We link every requirement to the control that meets it and to the evidence that the control works. When one control covers DORA, NIS2 (EU cybersecurity directive) and ISO 27001, the work is not repeated.
View a sample deliverable → (illustration of the structure, not a full DORA register)
Starting price
from €7 900
The price covers the stated base scope. Additional work is agreed in advance.
Timeline and your input
3–6 weeks
The ICT contract list, existing policies, the register of information if one exists, and time from the ICT-risk owner. Typical timeline 3–6 weeks.
What the price includes
- 1 legal entity
- 1 regulation — DORA
- Up to 100 employees
- Up to 15 supplier or ICT contracts reviewed
- Up to 25 existing policies assessed
- Register of Information covering up to 20 ICT arrangements
- 1 supervisory authority (the national competent authority under your licence)
Agreed separately: Implementation of the roadmap (from the published figure; it does not include the assessment); resilience testing; ongoing control-function work. Delivering the DORA plan is a separate project — from €9 900.
Detailed terms
The included 20 arrangements are a commercial limit, not a definition of a complete register. For 40 arrangements, the published increment for the additional 20 is 20 × €200 = €4 000, before other scope changes. Contract review and register processing are distinct activities. One quotation shows the full coverage and applicable increments, without charging twice for the same work.
Base-scope price. The exact price is fixed in writing before work starts. It changes only when the agreed number of entities, systems, domains, contracts, documents, interviews, languages or depth of review falls outside the base scope. No additional work is charged without prior agreement. Scope and prices.
- +€250 per additional supplier contract
- +€1 900 per additional legal entity in the same group
- 101–500 employees, or two regulations at once: from €13 900
- +€200 per additional ICT arrangement in the register
- Implementation of the roadmap: from €9 900 — after the assessment; the assessment is not included
A larger scope is one quotation, not stacked add-ons. The extra for a second entity applies to shared systems, policies and governance — a genuinely separate environment is quoted individually. Limits do not multiply automatically; the from €13 900 figure is the starting price for the expanded project as a whole; its scope is described in one quotation.
For small financial organisations: Financial services →
Sample output
Demonstration example — not a real client.
| ICT arrangement | Function | Critical or important | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core banking system (provider A) | Payments | yes | No documented exit strategy |
| Cloud archiving (provider B) | Archive | no | — |
| Service desk (provider C) | Customer support | yes | No audit-right clause |
If the register is rejected, the worked validation example shows how to trace a broken reference and document the correction. You can commission a register-only validation and correction service; the format, outputs and submission responsibilities are agreed before work starts.